Home: News

Care homes ‘not a priority’ in pandemic planning months before Covid hit

A November 2019 document shows the government chose not to prioritise adult social care in its flu pandemic plans

Ruby Lott-Lavigna
26 June 2023, 11.57am

A 'Stay At Home, Protect The NHS, Save Lives' sign outside Liverpool Street Station in London in 2021

|

Vuk Valcic/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Adult social care was not a priority in pandemic planning in the months leading up to the Covid outbreak, a senior government health official has said.

Speaking at the Covid-19 inquiry, Emma Reed, the director of emergency preparedness and health protection at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), said while preparing the adult social care sector for an influenza pandemic was “important” it “was not a priority”.

On Monday, the inquiry was shown a document from the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Programme (PiPP) board from November 2019 – months before the first coronavirus cases were recorded in the UK – which listed adult social care top in a list of “areas of work not prioritised for the next 6 months”.

Reed told the inquiry that it was more important that the adult social care sector prepared for a no-deal Brexit than for the risk of a flu pandemic.

Help us uncover the truth about Covid-19

The Covid-19 public inquiry is a historic chance to find out what really happened.

“My view at that time was preparing for a no-deal exit took precedence over completion of some of these pieces of work for a short period of time,” said Reed.

The inquiry has heard how the UK was over focused on preparing for a flu pandemic rather than a coronavirus pandemic, and that Operation Yellowhammer, a cross-government plan for a no-deal Brexit, diverted valuable resources in emergency preparation departments.

“My concern about the impact of adult social care as a result of a no-deal exit – a real incredible threat to that sector – was that that sector needed to prepare for and ready itself before a no-deal exit over the risk of a pandemic preparedness.”

A slide shown to the Covid inquiry revealing the government chose not to prioritise adult social care in its 2019 pandemic planning, months before Covid hit

A slide shown to the Covid inquiry revealing the government chose not to prioritise adult social care in its 2019 pandemic planning, months before Covid hit

|

Covid-19 inquiry

Last week, deputy prime minister Oliver Dowden defended the UK’s focus on preparing for a no-deal Brexit rather than for a pandemic.

The inquiry also heard how preparations for a flu pandemic from 2011 considered the UK would run “business as usual”.

A document from the UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy reads: “The UK Government does not plan to close borders, stop mass gatherings or impose controls on public transport during any pandemic.”

Reed said she was “not aware” of any conversation about closing borders or lockdowns.

Reed spoke during the first module of the Covid inquiry, which is seeking to explore the UK’s preparedness for the pandemic. Former health secretary Matt Hancock and former first minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon will speak on Tuesday and Thursday this week.

The inquiry continues.

We’ve got a newsletter for everyone

Whatever you’re interested in, there’s a free openDemocracy newsletter for you.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData